Skip to content
Friday, October 9, 2026
Explore diverse perspectives on Swiss culture, technology, …

The Worst Games of 2025, According to Metacritic

At every turn, fans are eagerly sharing their rankings of the top releases of 2025. However, what of the flops, the failures? It's time to take a few moments to examine the most panned games of the year, as determined by the critical consensus on Metacritic. Could each of these games as bad as the reviews suggest? Let's find out.

10. Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour

Metascore: 54/100, User Score: 3.4/10

First impressions to this showcase title were colored by its $9.99 price tag, with many voicing frustration it wasn't a bundled game like competing console launches. Professional assessment was quite mixed, from scathing critiques to more generous reviews that praised the charming software underneath the controversy. Despite the controversy, the title proved to be a strong seller during its launch month.

9. Rennsport

Aggregate Score: 53/100, User Score: 3.2/10

Billed as "not just a racing game," this vroom-vroom title from Competition Company and Teyon garnered overwhelmingly poor reviews. Critics noted that the game was lacking in almost every category, notably in a year filled with excellent racing titles. For many, this disappointing sim was advised to be left on the shelf.

8. Bubsy in: The Purrfect Collection

Metascore: 53/100, User Score: 8.6/10

Before we start: the confusing title grammar is a notable annoyance. This anthology of 1990s-era Bubsy titles features a rude feline known for constant jokes. Reviewers noted that these games were not good in their time and haven't gotten better with age. The improbably high user score stands as a baffling contrast to the critical reception.

7. Hunter x Hunter Fighting Game

Aggregate Score: 53, Audience Score: 3.5

This manga-based fighter faced harsh criticism from both reviewers and fans. Complaints centered on a small fighter lineup and a dearth of content. Player sentiment was particularly vitriolic, with some expressing a desire that the title's failure would serve as a lesson for similar releases.

6. Neptunia Riders Vs Dogoos

Metascore: 51, Audience Score: 5.3

Based on the niche Hyperdimension Neptunia series, this bike-riding title tasks players with rounding up slime-like creatures. The assessment was that its effort to recreate a unique feel was unsuccessful, coming across as more of a cash grab than a substantial series entry. Its short length combined with a full retail cost was criticized.

5. Captain Blood

Metascore: 50, User Score: 5.3

This title is a piece of lost media from the past, finally released after a very long time in legal limbo. The publishers made the decision to preserve the game as an original artifact of its time, accepting that modern gamers might dislike its old-school mechanics. As such, many reviews remarked that the fascinating story of its journey was more compelling than the end product.

4. Salvation

Metascore: 44, Audience Score: 2.4

This anime-styled action game drawing from games like *Returnal* disappointed with critics. Frequent criticisms were repetitive adversaries, monotonous stage design, and a unengaging plot. A particular feature involving the character's attire was seen as adding nothing and undermined the game's potential charm.

3. Paramedic Simulator

Aggregate Score: 44, Audience Score: 4.9

Recall the tense medical sims of the past, then strip away the compelling story. That, according to reviews, is essentially *Ambulance Life*. Reviewers found the emergency response sections to be tedious and repetitive, and the narrative's handling of its subject matter was criticized as being insensitive. The overall experience was deemed largely unsatisfying.

2. Tamagotchi Plaza

Metascore: 43, Audience Score: 5.8

This new direction for the classic digital companion formula makes the franchise into a shopping simulation title. The result, according to critics, was a unsatisfying collection of repetitive tasks that very soon overstayed its welcome. Some reviews went so far as to declare it one of the lowest-quality titles available on its platform, pointing to a complete absence of satisfying gameplay.

1. MindsEye

Aggregate Score: 37, Audience Score: 2.5

Positioned as a major open-world action game from a studio led by well-known figures, *MindsEye* was a notable commercial failure. Reviews savaged its lousy combat, boring plot, and a plethora of horrendous bugs. Several found it to be a significant step back compared to much older games in the action genre. Among the sea of negativity, a few of fans found fun in the experience, serving as a rare counterpoint.

Written by

Matthew Adams

A Swiss-based writer passionate about digital storytelling and cultural exploration, with a background in journalism and a love for hiking in the Alps.

Blogfenster

Type to search articles.